Obama’s War on Blacks

Home / Columns /

Obama’s War on Blacks

If you take the best of Rush Limbaugh and Howard Stern, the brilliance of Ben Carson, and add a touch of ethnic humor, you get James T. Harris, one of my favorite talk show hosts on the radio today. Broadcasting from the desert in Old Pueblo on 104.1, KQTH in Tucson, AZ, James T. is the quintessential Tea Party conservative, devout Christian and a dedicated father of three – all rolled into one . . . Oh yeah, and he’s black.

He’s the kind of guy I hate to argue with, which is why I don’t. I recently sat down with him and had a heart to heart about why the black leadership today is failing its own people. James T. doesn’t mince words and never leaves a doubt about where he stands.

Me; “Do you think Obama failed the black people in this country, and if so, why?”

James T.; “Absolutely. Americans of African descent had very high expectations of the first black president. The President was given – I say ‘given’ – everything he needed to be successful. Everything! Yet the very group that propelled him to victory – twice – still has the highest unemployment rate in the nation. Add to that the ridiculous murder and incarceration rate, coupled with illiteracy and dependency on government handouts, and you have nothing short of a narcissistic despot who, by all statistical evidence, has failed black people – miserably.

“Obama is an ideologue who used race to advance his agenda; he didn’t have black folks’ back.”

Me; “Considering what happened during the race riots in L.A. in the 60’s and more recently in Ferguson, MO, why – when black people riot – do they burn down their own neighborhoods?”

James T.; “Some would point you to America’s racial history as an excuse for rioting and looting. I’m too young for the Civil Rights generation’s melodramatic view of the ‘cup of sorrows.’ A perfect example of my early skepticism was the OJ decision. I was on – what the Civil Rights crew would consider – the ‘wrong side’; I always believed he was guilty of murder even though Mark Furman used the N-word.

“Let’s be honest. Black men have been acquitted of killing white people but the whites don’t react with mass violence. Whites don’t riot or burn down their own neighborhoods. It’s absolutely illogical that blacks do it. I mean, I used to think, what’s the point?”

Me; “I can’t see any, except to exploit the situation.”

James T.; “Exactly. And why is it beneficial to exploit black people? That’s the heart of the question – one that has plagued the black community for half a century. It’s a question that has left a myriad of sociological, philosophical and psychological babble in its wake . . . and the answer is full of complexity.

“It’s a question I asked my own father and I imagine every cognizant black person has asked at least once in his or her life. The worst part is; we seem to be moving away from sanity and into a deeper, darker hole.”

Me; “Do you have any theories?”

James T.; “The answer depends on which generational goggles you are wearing. I’m an old Gen-X-er, sandwiched between idealist (Civil Rights) Baby Boomers and angry (It’s a black ‘thang’ you wouldn’t understand) Gen-X activists.

“However, no matter what your generation, there are some things in life you just don’t do. I tell my own kids, ‘Don’t be stupid.’ As the great Jim Croce sang,

‘You don’t tug on Superman’s Cape,

You don’t spit into the wind,

You don’t pull the mask off that old Lone Ranger

And you don’t mess around with Jim . . . (or the police).’

“If my kids can remember that, then they probably won’t get into trouble with the cops.”

Me; “I remember that song well, I used to have all his albums.”

James T.; “Croce’s verse was iconic. His message was simple. There are some things you just don’t do. Like you don’t mess around where you eat. And if you don’t fit, don’t force it. Again, these were sayings and songs my generation grew up with.”

Me; “How has this mess in Ferguson affected you?”

James T; “It hasn’t. That’s just it. It shouldn’t be affecting anyone except the people in that community. Unfortunately, according to the Grand Jury testimonies, the kid did everything wrong. And now because the White House, Justice Department and Civil Rights charlatans like Sharpton and Jackson found a crisis to exploit, Michael Brown’s family and all the folks in the vicinity have to pay in unrest and property damage. It’s nauseating.”

Me; “And yet as a conservative commentator you definitely have something to say. So, how do you impact conversation in Tucson (and world-wide) as a member of the media?”

James T.; ““Black and angry was never my style. I blame my parents. They didn’t allow it, nor did they allow me to make excuses for any of my failures. I know I just dated myself by quoting Croce. And any time I hit the Conservative button, I am outed as an American of African descent. I choose that language, instead of African American, because ‘African American’ is now synonymous with those who need the government to support them – or the unelected ‘community leaders’ (organizers) to speak for them. I frequently say on my show, ‘It’s the culture stupid!’

“I also never watched Mississippi Burning and was never a fan of Driving Miss Daisy, the Butler, DJango, or The Help. Those movies, while based on history, did not give rise to healthy, constructive conversation. They had a political agenda that was to enflame the population, not cure the anger.

“My motto is: ‘It’s only racist if you want it to be.’ That gives people the benefit of the doubt until their brand of –ism can be confirmed. This is the message I spread on radio and the stage.”

Me; “Talk radio is your third incarnation. You started your career as a teacher, then spent a decade as a national speaker before morphing into a radio talk show host. Was this always the plan? (Laughing).

James T.; Plan? No, The only constant has been loving my Lord with all my heart, soul, mind, and strength. I mean think about it. If you love God with all your heart and love you neighbor as yourself, there wouldn’t be a need for ninety percent of today’s government or laws.

“The rest of my life has been a grand adventure that has included travelling the world, marrying a beautiful lady, raising three kids and a dog. I’ve always been political and very opinionated. I’ve been very blessed to be a teacher of some sort in each of my incarnations.”

Me; “Do you think America can get out of this tragic mess and eventually reunite as Americans, instead of Blacks versus Whites? I mean do you see a way forward for race relations in America?”

James T.; “Oh yeah, and it’s death. The Civil Rights generation must pass away before the ‘cup of sorrows’ can be poured out – never to be filled again. Is that harsh? Just look at Ferguson. The new black anger has no context. It’s not personal – it’s political.

“Until individuals are willing to move forward, willing to give the benefit of the doubt and take responsibility for their own individual actions, they will be slaves to the doomed collective. It’s time to break those bonds and cast aside the exploitation because Socialism always fails, no matter the agenda.

“Just saying.”

Embracing Shari’a Law: America’s Blind Spot

As Christians all around the world watched Dr. Meriam Ibrahim Ishagbravely endure unthinkable horrors of her captivity, release, re-arrest and now tenuous future, Americans in particular can take away one critical piece of knowledge. We absolutely do not want any form of the barbaric Shari’a law introduced into our U.S. courts.

Except it’s too late.

Thanks to efforts by the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU), Shari’a law is well on it’s way to becoming the new standard in civil court cases. As usual, the ACLU is playing the ‘guilt’ card and working against the intent of our First Amendment rights of free speech.

Attempting to get the jump on Shari’a, many states have already passed laws prohibiting the use of foreign religious law in their courts. Yet despite strong voter support for these measures, the ACLU is fighting to get them all overturned. Oklahoma was one such state and – sure enough – in 2013 a federal court struckdown their efforts, ignoring 70% of the population’s wishes that the U.S. Constitution take precedence.

The ACLU claims it is necessary to consider religious law (Shari’a) when negotiating adoptions, custody of children, executing a will and/or settling disputes over private property rights, to name a few. What the ACLU fails to mention is that within Shari’a law, women are considered property and thus have no rights, which means they have no say in court.

Proponents of Shari’a law also seem to forget that when foreigners come to America, they are supposed to assimilate into our culture, not the other way around.

Consider the case of the 2008 arranged marriage in Morocco between S.D., a 17 year-old girl, and M.J.R., a man she did not know. Born to a Muslim father, S.D. was by default forced into Islam and had no choice but to accept her fate of the prearranged marriage.

The teenager was introduced to the man at their wedding and one month later they moved to New Jersey so that M.J.R. could pursue his career in accounting.

Apparently it wasn’t ‘love at first sight’ or ‘wedded bliss’ because by 2010, S.D. (still a teenager) had filed for a restraining order against her ‘husband’ on the grounds of rape, kidnapping and aggravated assault. Apparently the man repeatedly forced her to have non-consensual sex and abused her when she tried to refuse.

Eventually M.J.R. took the teen to the home of an Imam and verbally divorced her in accordance with Shari’a law. However, the sexual assaults and abuse continued, even after the divorce.

Believing the laws of New Jersey would protect her, S.D. did what any logical abuse victim would do to defend herself. She lodged complaints with the police, filed for a restraining order against the assailant and sought permanent intervention through the courts.

Imagine her surprise when Hudson County Superior Court Judge Joseph Charlesrefused to uphold the restraining order because he felt the man brutalizing the teen was doing so out of a desire to live his faith. Furthermore, the Judge found that even though the religious customs clashed with the New Jersey law, Muslim beliefs took precedence.

In Judge Charles’ opinion he wrote, “This court does not feel that … this defendant had a criminal desire to or intent to sexually assault or to sexually contact the plaintiff when he did. The court believes that he was operating under his belief that it is, as the husband, his desire to have sex when … he wanted to … was something that was not prohibited.”

Interestingly enough, the leftists chanting the ‘war on women’ mantra were silent on this case. Perhaps they momentarily forgot that women don’t actually enjoy being raped or assaulted, even if it is by a man they are quasi ‘married’ to.

Fortunately S.D. had the financial resources to force an appeal of the case and eventually Judge Charles’ despicable decision was overturned by the appellate court. M.J.R. was then charged with sexual assault, kidnapping, aggravated assault and criminal restraint.

Even though this case was almost four years ago it brings forth the ever-present concern that Shari’a law is slowly and silently encroaching upon our U.S. Constitution and individual state’s rights. While this case was eventually made right, the very notion that any sitting judge would consider Shari’a law in an American court – should scare the pants off every American citizen.

As the world around us implodes with barbaric Muslim radicals and sympathizers on the march to eradicate all Judeo-Christian people everywhere, we must be ever vigilant to prevent it taking over at home. Stand firm for American laws. Stand firm for America.

All But Forgotten: Meriam’s Saga in Sudan Still Hanging

While the world moves forward and focuses on other issues, one innocent 27 year-old woman is stuck in a never-ending nightmare from which it seems she cannot escape. And instead of her situation improving, things are only getting worse.

Dr. Meriam Yahia Ibrahim Ishag, the Sudanese Christian mother of two who was arrested last summer on grounds of apostasy and adultery, still remains captive in Sudan. Although the apostasy conviction was overturned and she is not currently imprisoned, she has been re-charged with fraud for attempting to use South Sudan travel documents bearing her Christian name and not the name of her biological father.

And now, to make matters much worse, a civil suit has been filed against her by an alleged family member for ‘leaving her family,’ ‘converting from Islam,’ and participating in an ‘illegal marriage’ to a Christian U.S. citizen.

But aside from the obvious, what’s frequently overlooked in all of this mess is that the U.S. has botched this situation from the outset. The U.S. is – quite possibly – completely responsible for all of Meriam’s troubles in the first place, and for that there is no excuse.

As a matter of fact, our U.S. Embassy’s repeated failures to assist Meriam’s U.S. citizen husband, Daniel Wani, prompted 38 bi-partisan members of Congress, spearheaded by U.S. Rep. Trent Franks, AZ D-8, to send a letter to Secretary of State John Kerry requesting that he facilitate extrication of the family from the hostile Sudan to safety in the U.S. where they would be granted sanctuary. Evidence indicates Mr. Kerry disregarded the letter.

According to Daniel, he has tried unsuccessfully for three years to obtain a visa for his wife so that they could travel to the U.S. When his wife became pregnant with their second child last summer he tried to meet with Embassy personnel on three separate occasions to plead for rightful travel permits for Meriam and their toddler son, Martin, also a legal U.S. citizen. During each visit Daniel was told by Embassy employees they didn’t have time to deal with the matter.

Interestingly enough, it was when the small family departed the embassy after the third visit that a stranger, claiming to be Meriam’s relative, showed up with the religious police and had her arrested. Even now it remains unclear how the man knew of Meriam’s desire to exit Sudan, especially considering such an Embassy meeting should have been a private matter and Meriam claims she’d never met the stranger prior to that fateful day.

Another fact rarely mentioned is that according to the Daily Mail, Meriam is the owner of at least one successful business in Khartoum, possibly more. If her marriage were to be annulled and she were to be conveniently murdered per Shari’a law, then it would be easy for a shyster to usurp her businesses and take control. The man who originally accused her of apostasy is also the man who filed the recent civil suit.

Also of serious note is that the U.S. Embassy personnel do not recognize the couple’s two children as U.S. citizens because they don’t recognize Daniel as their father. In an absurd twist, U.S. Embassy officials are demanding proof in the form of a DNA test, which they are requiring be completed by a U.S. laboratory. That’s a little tricky when you’re stuck in Khartoum.

Such an unusual demand begs the question of how deep the corruption goes within the employees working at an Embassy paid for by our tax dollars. Because let’s face it, if Meriam is eliminated and it’s deemed she has no legal spouse or children – then voila, no one can stand in the way of taking away her businesses.

Embassy incompetence also exemplifies the corrupt disparity in our immigration policy. While Obama opens the floodgates to illegal illiterates expecting decades of handouts, he denies access to intelligent, educated people ready to contribute something positive to our society.

Instead of the U.S. personnel doing their job and assisting the family, they allowed the Shari’a police to arrest and imprison Meriam in Omdurman Federal Women’s Prison in Khartoum, where she was repeatedly beaten, assaulted, malnourished, and denied all medical treatment. When Meriam’s baby girl, Maya, was birthed two weeks prematurely, the guards refused to remove the chains binding Meriam’s feet together, causing Maya to be forced out through the birth canal in a restricted position.

Although Meriam pleaded to have her legs freed from the chains, her screams fell upon the guard’s deaf ears and she was forced to deliver in a terribly contorted position. Sadly, this was just another example of their unimaginable torture of a Christian woman and now there is concern her baby girl may be disabled and may have difficulty walking.

Bottom line. All of this was allowed to happen by U.S. Embassy personnel who are supervised by our embarrassing U.S. State Department, and ultimately overseen by a president who is incompetent in all foreign policy matters and demonstrates sympathy to radical Islamists.

One other small fact worth mentioning is that according to multiple sources, President Obama’s Kenyan half-brother, Malik Obama, is closely associated with Sudan’s President al-Bashir and has direct ties to their radical Islamist government. It’s hard to know whether Malik is involved in Meriam’s plight or not but the brotherly relationship definitely brings President Obama’s deafening silence about Meriam into question.

Let’s face it. The entire situation stinks and the longer it goes on the more suspicious the U.S. appears in all of it. What should have been a slam-dunk one-way ticket to freedom for the entire family has become a kangaroo circus of monumental and international proportions and four innocent lives still hang in the balance.

Without questions, the Shari’a deck is stacked against all women and particularly against this gentle mother who’s only crime has been defying radical Islamists by being an intelligent, hardworking, educated, Christian mother of two U.S. citizens.

Martial Law and a Would Be King

When Senator Obama told adoring fans that when he became president in 2008 he would fundamentally transform America, he wasn’t kidding. Today our country doesn’t even resemble what it was when the Chicago/Kenyan/Indonesian socialist took over.

Oh how I yearn for the good old days when our republic was managed by three branches of government and not just by a tyrant with a pen and a phone. And how nice it would be to see Congress pick itself up by the bootstraps, enforce the Constitution and impeach the corrupt man who’s occupying the people’s house on Pennsylvania Avenue.

But we all know that won’t happen because President Obama is – quite frankly – black.

Nothing else seems to matter to anyone. Not his underlying disdain for our once great American supremacy, nor his general incompetence in all things constitutional, nor his ineptitude in foreign policies. Not even his overt disregard for women, children and Christians, nor his disrespect for our military, nor all the Pinocchios he’s earned since taking office seem to mean a hill of beans. Still, you’d think someone in DC would notice Obama’s excessive and conspicuous consumption of a lavish lifestyle he’s endowed himself with at our expense.

Sadly, no one with any political clout seems to notice Obama’s monumental failings. Or at least if they do, they sure don’t seem to care. But they should.

People often comment that we just need to hang on until 2016 when Obama will be forced to move out of the White House, taking his condescending, foodie wife with him. But I have no illusions that he intends to vacate the premises. Quite the contrary, I believe he’s planning on staying right where he is, and here’s how he’s hoping to do it.

Obama and his cronies orchestrated a massive influx of illegal, illiterate, gangster-type thugs from Central America and Mexico to enter the U.S. and then when the pawns started pouring in, our Commander-In-Chief feigned shock at the situation. Naturally, the duped, liberal media plays along, trotting out photos and stories of tiny children who purportedly walked thousands of miles to reach freedom, which of course pulls at the heartstrings of unsuspecting and caring Americans.

But it’s all a slight-of-hand trick because Obama doesn’t care one iota about any of these indigents. Quite the contrary, his entire goal was to systematically redistributed hundreds of thousands of illegal destitutes throughout the continental U.S., not for humanitarian reasons, but for the singular purpose of overwhelming states’ infrastructures and syphoning critical monies from public coffers.

If Obama can use these poor foreigners to spread disease, poverty and illiteracy, then he will have succeeded in taxing our recently socialized healthcare system, welfare system and school systems into oblivion. This was a deliberate scheme on his part to destroy what’s left of our economy and deplete our public utilities and law enforcement capabilities to the max.

People can already see the toll this influx is taking on federal border patrol officers who can no longer focus on the job of patrolling the border because they’ve been re-tasked with the caretaking of illegals. Consequently, state and local law enforcement officers are filling in the void to monitor border operations, while leaving the public and citizen neighborhoods completely unprotected.

It’s only a small step to predict that families in unprotected areas will have no option but to fend for themselves, with the potential of causing vigilante groups to spring up and take on the mission of local, community law enforcement.

If this clever plan doesn’t infuriate the legal American public, nothing ever will. But if – God forbid – it does churn the public into action against the feds and illegals, I believe Obama will jump at the chance to invoke martial law and that would open the door for him to remain in office indefinitely. Because goodness knows, you can’t have a legitimate election if martial law is in force. Obama will set himself up as a temporary ruler and suspend all other governmental actions.

Governor Rick Perry did exactly what any governor worth his/her weight should do. He called up a portion of his National Guard troops and sent them to the border to assist in halting the flood of intruders. In Arizona, we’re still waiting for definitive action from Governor Jan Brewer, who shows no sign of protecting her own citizens from the unbearable onslaught of illegals.

I believe Obama set this entire scenario in motion in order to pit his corrupt, socialistic system of federal government against individual states and U.S. citizens. If states and the public must defend themselves against enemies – both foreign and domestic – a complete breakdown in our government could ensue.

All that will be left is the coronation.